AH1971
-
Posts
2,936 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
Football Recruits
Store
Events
Forums
Everything posted by AH1971
-
If I remember correctly, didn't Wyatt play Kamara's position from last year? Any chance they'd move Kamara back?
-
IU 52 Michigan State 7
-
Do damn proud of this university
-
Oregon 31 IU 13
-
IU 34 Iowa 17
-
IU 33 Illinois 27
-
IU 66 ISU 7
-
Need to absolutely piss pound Kennesaw State Saturday, even if it means pulling out tricks you aren't wanting to show in order to convert in the red zone. Predictive ratings took a bit of a bath after week 1.
-
IU 45 Kennesaw St 6
-
Ya, a 67.5 passing grade isn’t good. What’s your point?
-
Led Zepplin North America 75 was a party. Still have a hangover lol
-
I’m 72. My party days are over.
-
Totally trust Cig. At the same time, Cig is at the mercy of his players. Cig has had elite QB play for x amount of straight seasons. If Mendoza plays to potential, this team is fine. If Mendoza doesn’t take the next step, this season is going to be a migraine. I was not impressed with Mendoza today.
-
I’ve followed IU football longer than you’ve been alive. Spare me.
-
Play like we did today against a B10 team, 6 wins would be a minor miracle.
-
Because I thought Mike Woodson deserved a 4th year? Ok lol.
-
IU should win 8 games minimum with their schedule. They have three pre-season All-American’s and a QB who was just projected to go #1 in the most recent mock draft. We’re paying our head coach $9mil/yr and both coordinators $2+mil. 6-7 wins would be an abstract failure.
-
The biggest question marks concerning Mendoza were his decision making and down field accuracy. I don’t think today was any indication those question marks were put to bed. Enjoy your evening.
-
So if you throw into double and triple coverage and the ball doesn’t get intercepted it’s still a good throw? lol. That’s the entire point. His decision making is subpar. That’s what analytics show. Good grief.
-
Peep his pff grades from last year.His expected turnover %\throw was extremely high. PFF is about as analytical as it gets.
-
Like you said, “decisions to throw in double coverage that weren't good despite them not getting picked”. That’s not a recipe for long term success.
-
Deep analytics show his decision making is poor and is a high turnover prone player. At least at Cal. You can tell all the physical tools are there.
-
People will compare Rourke’s first game to Mendoza’s first game. I don’t buy it. Mendoza’s ability to process just didn’t seem there.
-
He’ll put up numbers in this system no question. But the difference between 9-10 wins and 6-7 wins is going to be the three things I listed. It is one game thankfully.
-
I get the Mendoza hype, but his pocket presence, decision making, and accuracy left a lot to be desired. His footwork also needs a ton of work. Mendoza going to have to reach his ceiling to replicate last year; his floor is exponentially lower than Rourke’s, that’s my concern.
