CSP

That's a good shot for Jack, tbh. That isn't guarded either.... not for Jack, and if Jack isn't allowed to shoot that, he shouldn't even be out there. Crummy pass by the "assist king", though.

Personally I would have had no issue throwing the sink at Hoiberg this offseason.

Well... UNT did lose their coach, but when scheduled them they still had him.. they finished 41st in the FPI this year... ahead of 25+ power 4 schools. Old Dominion finished 49th in FPI this year.

I think we all get @$$ tats TBH.... "2026 Natty Champions" across our butt cheeks.

Wonder why she transferred to Assumption

absolutely... he's without a doubt a 4... his best attribute is his rebounding, tbh. He's always been a 4... although, Woodson probably would have played him at the 2. lol ... He's a banger, though, rebounding rates ---- TDV -- DReb % 14 OReb %-- 2 (9.5% total) ...... Sisley 18%, 8% (13% total) Probably comes back at 6'8 230 next year, ready to roll..

Draft picks on both accounts are TBD... But like.. I don't agree with you on the bold... I can get down with the OL being "better" but we were still a Top 3 OL last year. Idk how those 3 could even be "better" than--- 494 carries 2665 yards (5.4 avg) 23TDs... 167 yards a game on the ground from those 3 combined. How much "better" could that actually look, in real time? Hoover, yeah.. very good. He isn't Mendoza. And he is NOT the athlete Mendoza is... not terrible, but not a plus athlete.

Wasn't getting a big salary with the Pacers, though? I can THINK of some of the reasons... I'm curious of the actual reason.

Great. I wonder what Carr's reasoning is for taking the job... love of IU? or?... it doesn't seem, necessarily, like a "step up" or maybe we're just paying a lot more? Doesn't ultimately matter, just kinda curious.

Seems a little tacky tack to me with all things considered. Different strokes for different folks. is this a new role we haven't previously employed? I really like what was said about Carr in the article.

Concur. I see in no way we are as good as we were this year offensively... but, ultimately, idk how we could be? We go from absurdly elite to still... VERY good. But, losing the Heisman winner, all conference TE, 2 all conference WRs, and your starting center... and two legit RBs, who are both going to be on NFL rosters comeback August... it's impossible to not feel those effects. I think Hoover, as Mendoza admitted to needing to understand early on... He doesn't have to win us the game, especially EARLY in a game... just make the plays that are there... if getting two first downs and punting, pinning the other team, and then smothering them later on is the best route in the 1Q (quick example) ... do that. We are elite on defense, elite on SPT... play the long game.

Ehh... I'm not a design, architecture guy. I just mean... the "above the stadium premium seating" is by far the best route for IU at this time... not "let's go add 20k worth of seating"... jmo. I feel like we could make one of these structures work very well... and I really think corporations are chomping at the bit for this stuff. Probably drive the ticket price for the rest of us down a little.

the WNIT Elite 8 lololololol

I just feel like a whole structure, like shown, added to assembly hall side of Memorial stadium seems logical.

Why do you think that? I think we are worse at every position, maybe quite a bit worse at QB (I do think Hoover is good, but not Mendoza) and TE. I do think our OL will be better.