iu eyedoc

As of now this has broke perfect for IU. Al Durham, love him as a guy, but had peaked at mediocre. TJD, nothing need be said. KL and JG are huge upside guys coming back. AF is a plus return if it happens. Race,by eligibility and ability, next to Durham, is the least impactful. Replace Durham with X Johnson and get Armaan back and the portal period will have been a plus for IU. Add Brooks for Race and...oh my.

Well tell her from me, I will mow your lawn in my Borat-kini if Lebron comes and you break the news.

Xavier Johnson, AF, and Brooks would be systematically ideal. I am torn on Race, I love him as a Hoosier, but think his roll would be diminished if he returns.

He isn't saying that the move isn't "great" but that Dane isn't a "Hoosier GREAT," as he orginally says. So he is still being a dik, just a dik about Dane, not the hire.

Party time

Were you told you mike be able to figure it out if you lewis close enough to his message and if you dane't fifer it out you might just might consider yourself a former Hoosier?

They can wait. I need to know who will be the asst coaches at IU. I'll just tell them that an unforeseen emergency patient came in.

Only problem is that Chris guy said: "I'm guessing a combination of 2 of the 3 of Lewis, Fife, and Turner. With either Roberts or May being DOBO" So I am left to wonder if he has some good intel and to get excited or he is just wishing in one hand and well %^@*&^ing in the other like the rest of us. The guy can be a bit vague on his level of certainty, but we all have our faults.

What are you talking about? Nowhere in his quote does he mention it is merely because of his first name, Adolph. That is you own inference.

What????? resumes? You are saying a shitty #158 Drexel was more deserving of the tourney than #11UCLA based on going 4-5 in conference but beating powerhouse Elon in the daunting CAA championship. Please.

But potentially never giving a 11 seeded UCLA a chance because of auto bidding a no chance Drexel does not make the tourney better. 15 seeds wins make the tourney great because they are part of the top 64 . Never giving a#11 kenpom UCLA team a chance to allow a #158 Drexel does nothing to make the tourney better.

So you feel better not having UCLA for Drexel? Why should a lesser team be rewarded for beating lesser teams? UCLA was obviously superior to many auto bids but they had tobeat MSU and some serious talent just to get into the 64 just for good feels.

Just eliminate auto bids, top 64. Auto bids are nohing more than just a participation trophy for lesser schools. If the commitee cant get it right, it's on them.

not sure fairness is making UCLA play an extra game while Drexel or Hartford sit, but optics ...yeah.

Seems pretty f up just take the last 8 teams in regardless of auto vs at large. Why penalize an 11 seed level team because they play in a challenging conference.

Can someone explain to me how the play in games are not all 4 16s vs 17s? How does a potential 11 have to play another potential 11 while 20 lesser teams have a rest?

To my knowledge the SEC has yet to eliminate the 1 yr sit for intra-conference transfers. If so, interesting decision.

When did he say that?

Xavier Johnson- He is what IU has lacked for years an alpha dog PG that can fill it up and dish it with equal efficiency KindaYogi-esque Plus he looks a little like Al Durham with the long chin, so kind sentimental.

FIFY

Armando? Is that the cook at Chipotle Bloomington?

I would love to see another year of Lander, but he and IU really need a strong shooting coach. Lander's jab jumper with no follow through was just awful form to watch. He looked like a nervous middle schooler that shows up at the rec and has to end up playing with the starting HS team.

If it for a player to announce he is staying right where he is at, then eye roll emoji. If CMW and staff wants to create some positive portal energy, I can get with it.

Why is there a presser?