I hope our new basketball coach is wildly successful.
But, as an Alum, donor (very small time), longtime fan, and taxpayer, I would like to see a postmortem report on the search. (I’m not saying that it would realistically ever happen.)
I think there are important questions that need to be answered regarding our program, the athletics department, and the management and stewardship of all of it.
For example: I don’t have a good feel at all for how “well” or how “poorly” the athletic department is being run.
- Was Dolson standing in a hole dug for him by his predecessors, and he did the best he could?
- Was the search conducted well? Poorly?
- Who was interested in the job… who wasn’t?
- How was the pool of candidates developed… who was on it?
- Who was interviewed…who wasn’t?
- How and when was the final selection made?
- What were the criteria?
Dolson is at least the second A.D. we’ve had that came into the job with zero experience as a D1 AD. Is he doing the job well or not? I can’t really tell.
With the exception of maybe the Cignetti hire, I don’t think I see him doing what “good to great” ADs seem to do.
And I don’t think our goals for this search were to get a coach that’s “better than Woodson” or to “make it to the tournament next year”. I thought we were looking for a “great to outstanding” coach that would compete for championships.
I think the primary question may be “ is this just where this once national championship level program finds itself”, or are we holding ourselves back as we continue to make some of the same mistakes and blunders?
I mean it sounds like after several bad basketball hires, we just went through a process (with tons of resources behind it ) where we hired our fifth choice. How exactly did that happen? (If it did).
Not at all sure what to think about all of this.