pumpfake

I suspect a number of injuries are a result of over training, or something like that. I recall several years ago listening to an interview with Pete Rose where the interviewer asked him about the increasing number of injuries. He basically said that today's players (at that time citing Eric Davis) tended to get injured more often because they were so lean and finely tuned. He cited his own durability and attributed it to having some cushion (fat) on his bones. LOL. I think there's some truth to this, but it applies to all sports and all teams - every team's fans think they have too many critical injuries (when Mo Creek had his two fluke injuries, Hummel went through two blown out knees as an example).

I can't disagree with these thoughts. IMO, we WILL have defections - who and how many will depend on what FG does. If he does nothing, I can see a significant exodus. If he brings in a homerun type hire, it can be minimized. Being over signed, we need there to be some attrition - especially if the new coach is to bring anyone new in. I'll add one thing: I believe Newkirk can be a solid contributor if he's reigned in and given a defined role. The current helter-skelter style of play is a recipe for bad decisions and turnovers. That's a major weakness that must be corrected.

She doesn't use an alias like 'hoosiertildeath' does she? LOL

Your friend is an example of modern day IU "settlers" - fans that no longer have high expectations. That kind of thinking is why our football program is historically garbage. I share this feeling. I'm getting to an age (mid 50's) where I feel that another lackluster hire may just mean never seeing my team pose a realistic threat for #6. There is absolutely no excuse for not making a significant upgrade to the coaching position. If not now, then when?

I don't believe I've ever been less upset after a loss to the University of Giant Drum. Pure apathy towards this team as it currently sits.

Maybe he had to rush to get to a job interview....

I have no idea how attractive CTC would be to Mizzou, but one thing going for him is that he's shown a better ability to recruit that state than Indiana recently.

That's an interesting take and one I wouldn't have thought of. Right now there aren't really many ex-IU guys out there (at least not currently head coaches), so I suppose Fife would be the most prominent of the group.

I saw that last night and had the same reaction. Wasn't there some Sesame Street song about "One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn't belong"? Personally, the level of disappointment I'd feel if they hired Fife would be as intense as the elation I'd feel if it were Billy D. (or even the other four coaches on that list).

On another site someone posted league W-L totals for the last 4 seasons. IU is 8th. Eighth! Last night on the broadcast they listed our league final position for each of the last several (6?) seasons, and it averaged somewhere around 7th. Unless that is considered successful (even tolerable) out West, I'd say it's obvious a change is needed.

Please let this be true!

To me, the claim that a given coach is a great developer of talent because he gets players into the NBA seems a bit overblown when it's also said that the NBA drafts on potential. We've had guys leave early that didn't improve exponentially (although I'd have to say Victor did). It seems like that reputation is more of a recruiting chip than a strong measure of coaching prowess.

I'd like to ask these media 'experts' one question: If this debacle of a season is about injuries and untalented players, how do you explain the play of this team in the first month of the season? The KU game was a good win and the performance against UNC was as good as a CTC team can play. Same players except OG, but it's not like OG was the lone reason we shot lights out. and played great defense (first half especially) No, this team has gotten worse as the season has progressed when it should have improved - that's teaching, preparation, and psychology - and it's not the first season this has happened. Another point I'd like to touch on is recruiting. It seems CTC has basically alienated in-state coaches and players (that well has gone dry) and now, with the tweets by RJ's coach it appears he's done the same with that area. This is a sinking ship, plain and simple. We see it and I believe the media types prefer to ignore it.

I do not understand the enthusiasm for Dane Fife. As previously mentioned, if he hadn't been an IU player no one would be mentioning his name. I also freely admit to being biased against Fife for leading the demand (threats) to make Mike Davis the HC when he (Davis) was still an interim head coach.

I won't completely dismiss the thought that 2 or 3 elite openings would be at least tempting, but there's also something against it too. Nobody wants to follow a legend and that would be the case at Duke for sure and to a lesser extent at UNC. When a legendary coach, one who had coached there for years, retires it almost always results in a string of coaches (UCLA, UNC, IU, etc.). Also, with the likely departures it would create immediate openings for possible blue chip recruits. And finally, worrying if your replacement coach might leave for greener pastures is a concern just settle for a lesser coach and accept your fate - most of us don't feel that way and hopefully neither does the powers that be.

Just like recruiting, coaching rumors are just that until the contract is signed. However, many times there is some substance to such rumors. I doubt anybody considers it to be a "done deal", but rather a sign that things may be moving and possibly in a vary favorable way.

I echo your comments 100%. I've tried to avoid "Crean bashing" because I believe he definitely resurrected our program and got it back on track, but it's become obvious he's right where he was at the end of his time at MU. It's really interesting how the comments in that 'famous' article about Crean when he left for IU are a perfect description of the present. I prefer to look at as "water seeks it's own level" and that's where we are with Tom Crean.

In this very down year for the league, we lose to bad teams. We even lose to opponents when they play poorly.

Thanks for the link. It's good to see someone has documented the recruiting history of CTC with data and in an unbiased way.

Absolutely correct - more than sufficient data is known on CTC's coaching ability. If I recall correctly, one thing Glass mentioned in his "assessment" of Crean a couple of years ago was about recruiting. No one can deny that recruiting is a significant factor in team success and ours has fallen off dramatically and is definitely trending downward. Even IF the evidence wasn't clear (and it is), the situation is irreparable at this point. Glass can do what must be done or prolong the inevitable.

Interesting. I recall him getting a lot of chatter among IU fans as a top up and coming coach before Crean. It's the reason that selecting an unproven guy scares me - IMO, it's the riskiest strategy.

This is true. The best candidate could be a relative unknown or a young unproven coach. He could also be a total flop. Past performance is probably the most reliable predictor of future success (and still with no guarantees). I suppose to an extent it's a crapshoot with whoever is chosen, but at least you can have a good idea of who will satisfy and invigorate the fanbase initially. I shared the belief (hope?) that a decent coach who came here could up his game as far as recruiting goes when CTC was hired. Yet, I'm not so sure he's attracted a significantly better share of the talent pool here than he did at MU. Recruiting, in state especially, is definitely a factor in choosing a replacement coach and assessing that capability probably takes a lot of research and guesswork.

I fully support continuing the narrative that Crean is a good strategist and developer of talent, and that he's highly successful despite an unrealistic fan base. Any program like NC State would be crazy not to jump at the chance to lure away a coach of CTC's stature. Please don't let him get away!!!! -- Brer Rabbit

Don's pretty smart & professional. He's always put on a loyal face in defending coaches, even when they may not have deserved it. I wonder if the frequent delays and "stand ups" he's had with Crean post games has been offensive to him? Possibly not, after all he took a lot of abuse from Knight (albeit less than poor Chuck Marlowe, RIP).

I think right now Donovan would be the #1 Grand Slam choice (however realistic). Beyond that, we've screwed up 3 times post-RMK and it's crucial that we get it right. Because of that, IMO we MUST get a guy that has proven he can win at a high level (the higher the better). It sends chills down my spine when I see names like Buzz Williams or Dane Fife bandied about. Williams hasn't done jack crap and Dane Fife hasn't proven anything yet (not to mention he was instrumental in saddling us with Mike Davis). Nope, there's a handful of coaches that are all but guaranteed to be vast upgrades over CTC and there's no reason to reach or settle. We're at a perfect time for finally getting our next great coach - the program is clean, the aura of the Bob Knight era has faded, top notch facilities and fan support. One other possible (?) factor is any new coach may not feel guilty for taking the job of a coach already under contract if stories of CTC not being well liked among his peers is true. If not now, then when?