Wrong. There are well run athletic departments, and ones that aren't.
Universities with well run athletic departments give their AD responsibility to manage the teams, they set expectations in terms of results, and then hold the AD accountable. Management 101, it applies to any organization, including ones within universities.
Poorly run athletic departments have outsiders or "stakeholders" exerting influence. When this happens it's no longer clear who is responsible for the results or who should be held accountable (and some higher up "stakeholders" can't be held accountable, like Quinn). The outsiders are rarely better than the AD at making personnel decisions, and they often have huge conflicts ("He may be the best human being I know" lol). This is a nightmare situation for any organization and creates terrible results.
Also, there is no way you're a trustee or whatever you claim to be.