-
Posts
1,095 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
Football Recruits
Store
Events
Forums
Everything posted by HoosierX
-
(2027) WR Jordan Carrasquillo
HoosierX replied to Lebowski's topic in Indiana Football Recruiting Forum
I was referring to "University of Indiana" -
(2027) WR Jordan Carrasquillo
HoosierX replied to Lebowski's topic in Indiana Football Recruiting Forum
Not off to a great start. -
B10 Championship & CFP tickets through IU
HoosierX replied to eddy4iu's topic in Indiana Hoosiers Football
I also only have first round playoff home game. I have 397 points, which I know is not super high. -
Probably so. But I think there are other voters who would choose Mendoza because it's a cool story versus giving it to someone like Sayin that benefits from having a dominant supporting cast.
-
B10 Basketball Recruiting Thread
HoosierX replied to hoosierpap's topic in Indiana Basketball Recruiting Forum
It looks like On3 previously rated him at 31 and now at 147. 2026 Industry Top Basketball Recruits -
B10 Basketball Recruiting Thread
HoosierX replied to hoosierpap's topic in Indiana Basketball Recruiting Forum
Which ranking has him #31 overall? Jacob Webber, La Lumiere School, Small Forward -
"Exposed in the playoff" OK kind of like Oregon? We get dinged for the playoff performance but no credit for the wins. We beat a team you have going 9-3 by 50 points (Nebraska).
-
https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/college-football-qb-power-rankings-cade-klubnik-drew-allar-top-expanded-preseason-list-of-50-signal-callers/ While another CBS sports article has him as the 26th ranked QB in their QB power rankings. Hilarious.
-
Based on just what we know from the stats above, my hypothesis is that that isn't true.. Everyone can't index towards playing older players as it's ultimately close to a zero game by age group across all D1 schools. (I guess more kids could be pushed towards juco/DII out of college, but I bet it's not a material number). If high majors are indexing more towards older players, I would expect to see a relative talent infusion of freshmen at mid-major and low-major ranks (compared to what they would have gotten in the past) and see their PPG numbers be higher than power 5, not lower.
-
AP Top 25 poll reactions: Oklahoma overrated, Clemson underrated in preseason college football rankings - CBSSports.com Pretty lazy take here IMO. Doesn't really account for the quality pieces we have coming back or Cignetti's track record with transfer QBs. Plus, his last point on our schedule doesn't make any sense for several reasons. 1) We're not ranked in a spot that would imply we're going to make the playoffs 2) What does our schedule have anything to do with whether or not we're underrated or overrated vs. our AP ranking?
