Jump to content

HoosierHoops1

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,304

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Everything posted by HoosierHoops1

  1. HoosierHoops1
    That's my point. I imagine some senators etc and some school administrators will push for guardrails, regulations and penalties, and an enforcement division.
  2. HoosierHoops1
    I only think of it as a failure because they finally rose to #1 and only held it for a day and then got beat by a low rated mid-major in the sweet 16. It was far below expectations. Indiana matched or exceeded expectations.
  3. HoosierHoops1
    We'll have to see how the courts, states and universities come out on the subject. Schools aren't supposed to have a hand in NIL and it's not supposed to be an inducement or a transfer preventative. Could get sticky in spots the next few years as regulations and enforcement catch up to actions.
  4. HoosierHoops1
    PureDoo!
  5. HoosierHoops1
    I don't think it says the coach can't pull it (IE: kick a kid off) but that the university still honors the concept of the scholly and the kid gets 4 years of free schooling.
  6. HoosierHoops1
    I think some services were top 25 5 stat, 26-100 4 star etc and some assigned a rating # and anyone above 99.00 was a 5star whether that stopped at 21 or continued to 30 whatever.
  7. HoosierHoops1
    Last year you could. Indiana could have had 15, if Al and Joey has taken their Covid year here.
  8. HoosierHoops1
    Kansas had 14.
  9. HoosierHoops1
    I'm not advocating getting rid of Leal or anyone, just when people make a point to say there's no need to replace the 13th player because they don't play anyway. We're not trying to recruit a new #13 but someone better than that. it's not trying to replace Priller with Hoetzel.
  10. HoosierHoops1
    You did it again!
  11. HoosierHoops1
    If this were last year, I'd be with you, but I think we're going to have a strong chance to be good next season with our roster now and don't need any potential distractions.
  12. HoosierHoops1
    Exactly. Our Bates is on the floor!
  13. HoosierHoops1
    I think the walk-on went in as a wing, guard. Wasn't playing in a spot that LD would occupy.
  14. HoosierHoops1
    We wouldn't be trading the 13th for a planned 10-13 type player. If we got a new player at the expense of a current player, they would be expected to be in the rotation.
  15. HoosierHoops1
    I thought about the "pay his own way" angle yesterday. I'm not sure if you're allowed to go from scholarship player to walk-on.
  16. HoosierHoops1
    I think Banks could sub in the Galloway/Kopp spot and we would gain every bit as much as we would lose.
  17. HoosierHoops1
    I've heard ruh-new eau like beautiful
  18. HoosierHoops1
    He played about exactly how he should have been expected but many expected closer to 40-42% it seems. Plus, taking and making more.
  19. HoosierHoops1
  20. HoosierHoops1
    I thought about trying that last week!
  21. HoosierHoops1
    Who is Indiana's Trae Young in this scenario and who is Cleveland's Dexter Dennis? Hang on a sec, I'm gonna slide into the portal and get me a Trae Young to go, maybe 2. BRB.
  22. HoosierHoops1
    With our putrid offense we had big leads in many games, but 1 player, by and large, we couldn't stop and that fueled the comeback. Suppose we add a 40% shooter but he's a JBJ defense clone? We won't be better off.
  23. HoosierHoops1
    Should be illegal.
  24. HoosierHoops1
    Both overtimes and end of regulation had Lander playing...
  25. HoosierHoops1
    That's what I was wondering
×
×
  • Create New...