CSP

5 hours since the last post in this thread, 2 whole posts the last 12 hrs....

The rankings in the portal are.... ehhh.. very much.. idk the term, but... I think they should rank them by eligibility remaining, as one example.

The math doesn't math when you want to see things negatively to begin with lol

Plenty of guys are still "injured" and dress, though.

Goode played 139 mins the year he wants back, Leal played 24 total mins. I'd prefer they use total mins played, honestly, instead of games.

He played 18 total mins that year lol

I didn't see the last three.

I have no idea. But he only played 9 games and they were all at the beginning of the year.

He fits the criteria that's already been laid out by the NCAA. Those two still don't.

Great win

He complements the rest of the roster better, and he can keep the ball in front of him defensively. He's a more effective cutter, a better passer. Anything outside of shooting, he's better to a lot better than Goode, IMO.

Oh. Ok ... I prefer Leal over Goode. But, like I said in the last post, every post, 11 games 2min per game... yeah seems about right.

Haven't seen this much and that's basically the role we want him in this year....

playing modern basketball would have too

I prefer Leal. That's great Goode is going to get his. Leal has a few post-season games, too, I believe. I don't really think either should, tbh. I agree. lol .... you didn't read that post correctly if you think I was criticizing him, you saw the sentence or two right above it when I listed an example of his leadership, yes? I know Goode is a leader; it's evident, the poster, I guess, doesn't.

Why are you quoting me? We went 19-13 on the season with a losing record against P4 teams. I assume that is the rebuttal we'd hear from the poster I quoted.

So the differnce between elite and plus is what? Don't agree with that either. Enright is very good catch and shoot, coupled with assist rate, that plays with anyone. Now... those two can't play with Ballo, MM, and Malik...not enough shot creators. Those two--- plus Wilkerson, TDV, and Bailey... oh yeah, that can fit just fine. But again, I don't even want him in that role/on the court all that much. I'm really just talking about a really good practice player, emergency guy. I don't think he'll see the court much with our team we have assembled so far.

ummm well.... didn't he have to grab our former B1G player of the year and All-American of a coach and essentially force him into the handshake line vs... Maryland? If by leadership you mean.... Ws/LS and results, then no, I guess you wouldn't have found much leadership from him.

wait you DISLIKE Leal?

Other than an eye test, how could you support it? Please don't say steals per game or something like that.... I value specific skills at the bottom of the bench or crazy potential/size. Leal does have one of those. This is just discussion, I'm not actually clamoring for him, but as I've stated... absolutely could end up with worse.

He's just a really good defender. I'm not sure how anyone could argue that.

This post might hold a little weight if he didn't play 24mpg in conference games. If we're actually deciphering the difference between "elite" and "very good" I really don't care. Call him very good. He's won us games with his defense.

I don't agree with the bold. I'm not really impressed with Goode the player, but I am with his leadership, toughness, and hustle. Other than that.... his only basketball skill is standing at the 3pt line. I never mentioned how many mins I wanted/expected him to play. With our roster now.... less than 5 mins. I don't really know what I've oversold. He's a very good basketball player in a lot of areas, especially if he's your 11th guy.

Do you see many listed that aren't elite/very good?