No, it's not hypocrisy. That is claiming one thing and doing something else. He mentioned the "upper class" creating the amateur model to "exclude lower classes." Sounds like class warfare which prompted my "commie stuff" comment. I am all for capitalism and have stated a few times already PRO SPORTS ALREADY EXIST. You can play for pay. No one, including me, has argued against that. I don't mind if LeBron makes $50million a game, if someone is willing to pay it.
Our apparently insurmountable difference of opinion is that you think anyone doing anything of economic value has to be paid top dollar or it's a moral outrage. I think that is patently (and demonstrably) ridiculous. Everyday millions of people volunterr to do millions of things for free because they enjoy them, for others benefit, they feel obligated, etc. They don't want or expect to be paid, even though they are offering something of value (time, effort, expertise.)
For a long time college athletes played only in exchange for a scholarship and possibly to develop into a pro (for the the elite players.) However, the vast majority did it for the love of the sport. Over the course of time the schools and others started to profit greatly from this arrangement. Is that "fair"? I think so. They signed up for that arrangement, no one was enslaved and forced to play college basketball by the NCAA. They coulda dropped out of school and done anything else at any time.That is the break-down in your comparisons, playing college sports is not the same as being in a gulag, it's completely voluntary. Was the system corrupt? Absolutely. Are we putting the genie back in the bottle? Not likely. So congratulations, you win, we now have a couple more bastardized pro-sports leagues.
I could go on, but that is more than enough and I'm not changing anyone's mind, so I'll let it go.