Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

go iu bb

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    4,806
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by go iu bb


  1. 6 hours ago, MemphisHoosier said:

    The flip is official.  I'm glad this happened earlier enough in the cycle for the staff to pivot and prioritize.

    https://247sports.com/article/fsu-flips-4-star-db-jay-timmons-from-indiana-251101400/

    I often wonder why football players even bother announcing commitments since they just seem to be more of who the current leader is since flipping in football is so common. 

    Good for him getting to play for his dream school. One thing that seemed odd was he says he's never been a big sports fan yet he's going to be a high major college player.


  2. 36 minutes ago, Demo said:

    IMG_1852.png
     

    I’m wrong plenty on this, but I always assume if the kid is doing the big public event and he’s got a local school on his list he’s staying home. St Joe’s is like 10 mins from Roman Catholic.

    I understand that it's the home school, but a recruit choosing St Joe's over IU would be a kick in the nuts. I'd still be surprised if it's not UT or IU.

    I think (with no evidence other than last visit right before the announcement and longer relationship with the staff/HC) that UT is the likely choice but IU is first in the picture and he does seem to be looking at himself in the IU uniform so....


  3. 56 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

    I’m probably alone in not really wanting this to start off the class. 
     
    This would be a trust in the staff choice for me here.  

    We're not Duke so we're not going to have a roster full of top 30 players.

    This guy is 6'7" who has PG skills since he played that position until a growth spurt. Ranked in the top 100 in the 247 composite ranking and has multiple other P5 offers, including Auburn who has been quite good under Pearl.

    I'm not really sure what there is to be so skeptical about but you don't seem to like much of what this staff has done so I guess that makes sense. If it makes you feel better, I suspect that he'll end up at Texas so you won't have to worry about it. That staff has been recruiting him longer and he visits them right before announcing his decision.


  4. 20 minutes ago, HoosierHoopster said:

    Without knowing the rules or looking them up, that sounds like a real stretch and fairly obvious attempt to circumvent the roster limitation. Maybe an issue for the compliance team, but the limit is 13 before extra money cost to the U.

    From what I've seen, it sounds like up to $2.5M in scholarships above the old roster limit will count against the amount of revenue sharing a school can pay. In effect, revenue sharing is used to pay for the scholarships. That's my understanding, at least. So NIL paying for school with no scholarship or revenue sharing paying for the scholarship seems like basically the same thing.

    https://businessofcollegesports.com/other/new-roster-limits-set-by-house-v-ncaa/

    New Scholarships Can Be Created

    It’s not all bad news. Schools do have the option to increase scholarships in sports where the previous scholarship limits were lower than the new roster limits. It was initially anticipated that not many would do this, as the value of new scholarships up to $2.5 million will count against the amount a school can distribute for revenue sharing.


  5. I like this pick up from out of the blue. Another shooter and a combo guard with good size. He'll also be 20 at the start of the season with experience against players in the top Serbian league.

    From looking at his stats it looks like he is a decent rebounder for a guard, is a willing passer, and can get steals (although not consistently). It looks like he can get a bit sloppy with the ball, though. I guess consistency might be something he needs to work on.

    image.thumb.png.6b7f1cfea8958bf1feb7ef2da1190d05.png

    Edit: Reading on peegs that he's expected to be a depth/development player next year so don't expect too much in year 1.


  6. 1 hour ago, rayl456 said:

    Does that happen frequently?  I’m a box of rocks when it comes to these things.  LOL. :)))

    It's new to football. They previously had to be full scholarship or no scholarship for a few sports like football and basketball. Other sports already had partial scholarships.


  7. 17 hours ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

    TONIGHT at 12 AM EST. Class of 2027 prospects can officially get into direct contact with college coaches starting at midnight.

    I expect we'll soon start getting reports of who the staff reached out to today. An idea of who and which positions they are prioritizing at this time for that class.


  8. On 6/13/2025 at 3:24 PM, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

    Listed as a 6'5" SG by 247.  He attended Overtime Elite last year but appears to be headed to Moravian Prep in Hudson, NC for the 25-26 season.  He received the Impact Award for his play at the just ended NBPA Top 100 Camp.

    @kohl_rosario

    247

    Rivals

    On3

    MaxPreps

    https://www.on3.com/teams/indiana-hoosiers/news/indiana-extends-offer-to-2026-3-star-guard-kohl-rosario/

     

    Interesting. He's a high 3*/low 4* but his offer list looks like someone who is top 30. One that the schools think  the recruiting services have missed on, it looks like.


  9. I saw that the change for the women included a technical if they lost the challenge. Kind of dumb. It's not like they have a bunch of challenges they can use to abuse the system, just the 1.

    Edit: I read the release from the NCAA. This actually makes sense. The women don't need a timeout to challenge, but if they do that then fail the challenge they'll be assessed the technical for excessive timeouts. So they actually have more options to use the challenge than the men do.

    The wording from the release:

    Teams will not be required to have a timeout to make a video review challenge in NCAA women's basketball competition. However, a failed challenge will result in a technical foul for an excessive timeout.


  10. 13 minutes ago, Hoosier987 said:

    Does anyone know what happened to Tyler Cherry? He was supposedly a big get...at least at the time. If memory serves, he isn't on this year's team but he is still part of the program???

    He injured his knee at the end of last season so he wouldn't have played or practiced this season. He is temporarily off the roster because of that. He is still helping out with the team as a student coach. The expectation is that he'll be back on the roster in 2026.


  11. 1 hour ago, Demo said:

    I don’t think he’s gonna get you this one, but based on what he’s brought in and what I’ve been able to see of his most recent offers I like your chances. Keep an eye on Alexander-Moody. He’s not gonna dazzle with his rating, though I imagine he’ll be rising, but that kid plays with his hair on fire all the time. Pretty big fan of his.

    Moody was initially ranked by 247 and the 247 composite in the top 70. I guess inconsistent play caused him to drop to his current ranking. So if he can fix that, he should be able to move up quite a bit. 


  12. He'll be making an official visit to IU in September. The date(s) weren't mentioned but it won't be the weekend of the 6th since he'll be visiting Oregon then.

    He also said he and his step-dad have a good relationship with Clark and said they're close.

    He was the first guard the new staff offered. He's noticed that they've watched very game of his that they could.

×