rcbowla

I think the misunderstanding here is you are looking at it from a perspective of what YOU would do. I'm looking at it from what I expect MW to do. I'm not really disagreeing with your point.

At the end of games you need stops just as often/importantly as buckets. Trey has and will continue to be MW's most trusted player. I don't understand why people think that all of a sudden a So is going to come in and just relegate a 5th year Trey to the bench at the most important times.

Wonderful.....we go to Oregon in year 1

Between this and the Luke Goode discussion this place has hit its yearly quota of puns.

Now if he were like the Oakland Bridge? That'd be a long and agonizing time.

I went there to see it with my only real visual concept coming from "full house" and expecting it to be this huge marvel. It wasn't lol.

Funny enough....Golden Gate Bridge isn't very long and is remarkably underwhelming in person.

How on earth was this kid not D1 already?

What's the deal with kids painting their finger nails?

Santos either greatly improved his shot or this was an outlier year because his 1st 2 years from 3 were......not good. That's being nice about it

Is it realistic to expect Tucker to be better at everything, outside of shooting and rebounding, than Mbagko was as a FR? If that's the case then this kid is being severely overlooked.

And you inserted a comma where there shouldn't have been one. You keep on keepin' on my man.

Since you want to correct other's grammar. The point is moot. The point is also mute though as it is incapable of speech.

You could mix Trey in with the 2 guards. All 3 can create off the high ball screen and get teams scrambling.

Yeah, I'm not sure why you don't trade down at that point. Just seemed to be a bad pick for them at #8.

If I'm being optimistic I think one major upgrade for next year is bench scoring. For several years now we have wondered where the scoring would come from off the bench. Next year we should be able to rely on 2-3 guys to provide scoring off the bench. Last year we had zero reliable bench scorers and quite honestly only had 3-4 reliable starter scorers on a given night.

This is better than I could have anticipated for this roster spot. High level player in your 8-10 range

Just need a big then tie a bow on this thing and let's see how things shake out. The staff has hammered just about every need we had so I'll certainly give them credit for that. No excuses next year. I think Nik (Monmouth guy that I'm not going to try to spell name correctly) may not wow anyone but he provides what we need at the backup 5. A mature body, good rebounder both offensive and defensive and also likely to accept a minimum role. I think he can effectively guard most 5's but absolutely no switching with him lol.

Nice! Welcome Luke. Goode to have you on board

You got my prayers man. Hate to hear this.

The, that's good enough for starting 2 guard at IU, jokes in....1,2,3....

If you have Bally sports as part of your provider's package then you could see it. I do not and was pretty angry.

In the case of Ballo you can see how it would make sense. If nothing else Woodson has a rep now of developing/unlocking bigs' potential to get to the next level. I'd say that's the biggest motivator for most players, as it should be honestly.

From that article it sounds like he'd probably be able raise a decent amount of $ to help his family. On top of his initial NIL amount at IU. Might be a perfect match tbh.

According to Torvik if Goode were to commit we'd go from 20th to 14th