Lebowski

The Dude abides.

All these comments are music to my ears. Defense and high quality shots baby. Love it.

IU - A lot USI - Not enough

10 boards from a guard like Romeo in a CAM system doesn't surprise me one bit. I think I remember something from last year where he said he wants to see something like 7 boards a game from the guards?

After that thumpin' from Iowa I changed my tune. IU might not even win 5 games this year.

I'm pleased to see the higher up folks at IU made a due process decision on this matter and I hope the victim is being surrounded by good people to help her move forward. As for, Mr. Ellison, he's starting to understand what a societal paradigm shift is.

They're going into the meat grinder now. But honestly after 5 games under their belt I'm looking at all home games (minus Penn St.) as a likely win. That could put IU at 6 with the potential of 7 or 8 (possible upsets against Penn St. or Michigan) wins going into the Bucket game. We're talking IU football here so my glass half full outlook is more so delusional than anything else.

Is there a younger Nunge playing with Lander in AAU or something?

In regards to this game, if IU can run the ball and stop the run I like the Hoosiers' chances. It will all come down to the front 5 and front 7 though. I'd like to see some defensive takeaways that results into points. If that happens IU has a really good chance winning the game.

LOL!!! Here's to hope. His formula must put the Irish up there. Because Richmond, Central Connecticut, Old Dominion, UMass, and Ohio aren't really SOS power houses. Ya feelin' me?

A lot of season to play out. So much can happen.

IMO, Belmont really fits his style of play.

Great win! Horrible weather. Power 5 opponent. Front 5 and front 7 controlled the line of scrimmage. Ramsey and Scott is exactly what Coach Allen is looking for on the offensive side. It's not pretty but effective. Ramsey's ability to run the ball is the reason why Scott racked up 200+ on a power 5 conference football team. If Virginia didn't adjust after IU's first drive, Ramsey more than likely rushes for 100+ yards. Ramsey was able to read his options effectively and Scott let his front 5 open holes for him. It was absolutely beautiful to watch. Most importantly, IU was able to run the ball and put Virginia in a lot of 3rd and longs all while the defense pretty much won this game and that will be the mantra of IU football under Coach Allen.

Creedence

Kinda, but there's a lot to his story. I don't recall him going as high as 4*. But I could be mistaken. Regardless, I think I understand your point, there's another RB in the waiting if needed. If that's not what you meant my apologies for misunderstanding you.

I thought Ramsey played well. I don't see a reason to bench him for Penix at the moment. The RB position is 4 deep. So I don't think it's as bad as it might look. I think folks like Brookins and Majette will have to step it up. Scott and Walker will more than likely not be red shirted, unfortunately. And by the end of the season Walker might be the guy. And it looks like they're going get Taylor some touches as well. Personally I don't think Taylor as a traditional RB. I see him more as a slot/wing or wildcat. A type of guy you want to make sure he gets the ball out in the open.

The Dude abides.

Is it me or are the rankings of the Big Ten East schools too high? I think the only legit ranking is OSU. Maybe Michigan. But both MSU and PSU are way too high. At least for now. Just my opinion.

Anybody have any details on this? https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/college/indiana/2018/08/24/iu-football-standout-rb-morgan-ellison-indefinitely-suspended/1085600002/

Man, they're back to a depth issue at that position.

Seems like someone is over thinking the game of basketball. Isn't this concept just a pickup game at your local park? I'd be real surprised if this becomes an actual rule in organizations like the NBA, NCAA and IHSAA. If it does I would push for just playing to a set number and eliminate the game clock all together. You would still have the shot clock and all the "time based" rules would still exists obviously. This rule seems to punish the team winning up to the "final time" of regulation aka the end of the game as we know it.

Honestly, I really don't take that much stock in these rating systems. While they are fun to see and what not it's really about the coaches ability to see player potential/skill set along with player development. And the development part is on both the player and coaching staff. A couple of good recent examples are Cody Latimer (3* with only one offer) and David Kenney (4* with 12 offers). I really like what I'm seeing so far this year in regards to strength and speed development. Now it's up to the other coaches to hone in on their specialty to develop player position. It's seems like a completely different vibe with the entire program this year and I hope it translates into more wins on the field.

http://iuhoosiers.com/news/2018/6/29/football-diprimio-notebook-new-strength-coaches-amaze-the-hoosiers.aspx

I blame Kelvin Sampson for a lot of the heart ache we Hoosiers have gone through. How he's still coaching is beyond me. And this article is just click bait. We all know how well last year's bunch of guys played. They all bought in and got better over the season. I'm really excited to see how they do this year.

I'm actually a little more optimistic this year than I was last year. Adding another QB with RPO experience really boosted my glass half full outlook. I've mentioned on here before but I think they have a really good chance to start off the season 4-1. And of the other remaining games on the schedule I think there are 4 games (home: Iowa, Maryland, Purdue; away: Minnesota) that might be winnable. And if they can run the ball and stop the run they'll win more than we're accustom to seeing, might even get an upset or two in.