JSHoosier

That just means he made the conference semifinals, and he's an IU guy. Just made the shortlist to replace Woodson when he retires.

What recruits?

It's about more than the record.

Real question is does Woodson even remember their names?

Fixed. He wasn't really anything special as an NBA player either.

And in his only year as a head coach was 13-69. Buckner hasn't been a winner in many years.

Would it really surprise you?

As poorly run as IU has been, I wouldn't be surprised if they're mainly concerned with keeping Woodson and deal with the fallout later. We shouldn't underestimate just how deeply unserious IU is.

It is the IU way. Until IU leadership actually gets serious it'll be like a monkey screwing a football.

Well it took 3 years to figure out how much work college coaching is. Galloway had 1 good shooting year in 4, so is that 3 learning years total or does the counter have to start over since he shot well last year?

Either not capable or semi retired anyway so doesn't give a darn. So instead of fixing the problem IU doubles down. The last 20+ years are because IU leadership is a complete circus. Give added NIL and GM type role to a good coach and see what happens. No, let's do that for a crappy coach so we don't have to fire a guy that played here over 40 years ago.

Not sure it's an age thing, Pearl is in his 60s and seems to have the energy.

Woodson needing 3 years to figure out how much work coaching college takes isn't much of a defense IMO. Frankly I think it's just emphasizes that he never should've been hired.

I'd take Crean back over Woodson.

Imagine if IU gave that support to a good coach.

"Mike Woodson wants to know what you think you're doing" "Mike Woodson is in my office. And why do you refer to yourself in 3rd person?" Not sold on May though.

It only took 3 years and a total collapse. Plus he was a competitive player (ignore that that didn't work so well for him in the NBA). We're totally saved. Plus Armond Hill should wake up from his season long nap (coma?) any day now, his 72-141 record with 0 winning seasons should provide some valuable insight. Yep, everything is fine and totally not at all a dumpster fire.

*checks last 20 years* Do you really want the answer to that?

Woodson finally figured out how much work being a college coach is, after 3 years. That's so much better.

He'll be unbeatable once Armond Hill wakes up.

Or thinking Woodson the player means jack about Woodson the coach. Good player doesn't equate to good executive or coach.

Personally I think it's great how he's so insistent on what he thinks Woodson will do, and completely ignores what Woodson has actually shown.

And the fact we saw some of the same problems his Knicks teams had doesn't suggest he has much ability or desire to change how he does things.

And the Yankees haven't won it all since 2009, and didn't make the playoffs last year.