IUHoosierJoe

I think this is reasonable, and I would add compete for or win the Big Ten tournament. No reason to keep embarrassing ourselves almost every year in that event.

Indiana 37, Nebraska 14

Dayton appears to be doing just fine without him.

I can’t see this, but I saw a picture of him a few days ago and thought the same thing.

Guys aspiring to play on Sundays shouldn’t have to find a weaker college team to get playing time.

Indiana 42, Northwestern 9

This has been spot on. Hopefully Mullins makes it 4 for 4 correct.

And 10 years ago, Archie was supposedly a basketball savant, sort of like people think of Shrewsberry now. Sorry, but I don’t see it. I mean, at least Archie has a successful tenure at Dayton on his resume.

Indiana 37, Maryland 19

Fine. Cig doesn’t seem like a guy who wants to finish his career winning games in a half empty stadium. So I suspect a lot of folks will be able to go back to bitching about the quality of football before long.

Indiana 50, Charlotte 14

Indiana 23, UCLA 17

Agree with you. I was at the game and Rourke had immediate pressure on him several times, especially after the middle of the second quarter.

Indiana 53, W Illinois 9

And Steve Downing being the AD.

Indiana 37, Florida Intl 17.

Unfortunately, I think this says it all.

Archie never really impressed me, even at Dayton. Dayton has always been a very good, well-supported program at their level. Archie certainly had a good record there, but he still lost a lot of games he shouldn’t have lost, and had quite a few close, lucky wins over inferior competition. That Elite 8 team caught fire at the right time. He was about to be run out of town in the middle of that season (started 1-5 in conference, I believe).

Valid point that makes one wonder why we’d hire a 63 year old coach in the first place given all the recent turnover in coaches we’ve already had. And no, I’m not suggesting that Woodson be fired, just a question I’ve always had given your valid point.

I guess that’s one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is he was given a policy to follow and he chose, on his own terms, not to follow it.

Interesting. You should have trademarked that, lol.

Yeah, maybe there’s some smoke that he’s going to flip his commitment to us if he’s dropping already, lol.

Most of their interviews are really good, but I always start the podcast 20 or 30 minutes in so I get past their nonsense.

Not an inside scoop, but heard or read a rumor somewhere that with all the other changes happening, they would like to bring the tournament back to Chicago or Indianapolis for next season.

The point is, if you’re visiting schools, you’re not committed, whether it’s IU you’re visiting or someone else.