RaceToTheTop

Betting isn’t knowing. Try again.

Yes — of the 36 brackets posted in the bracket matrix today IU is listed as in the tourney on 28. One at large below IU — Texas.

Ummm….you are wanting to bet him on it which by your logic means you have info.

I’m not seeing where brownell’s buyout is 8 million. From the contract someone posted it looks like $8 buyout if Clemson terminates but $3.3 million if he leaves on his own.

Agents send smokescreens to drive up interest in their client.

So what candidate do we freak out today about?

I would assume that IU fans would want Boise State to win the MWC tournament now because there was a chance the committee already had them in the field while Colorado State was on the wrong side of the bubble. The ordering of UNC, IU, Texas, Xavier, and San Diego State will be interesting.

Those skeletons must be buried miles deep since he’s no one seems to know what they are and no one can even say what they are. and you don’t continue to win for twenty years just because of some ‘winning culture’. The whole ‘everybody wins there’ being used for a reason that someone wins is just so lame.

So is ball state.

LOL, I just posted the opposite about the game before it.

Have to say watching the Big Ten tournament and then watching the New Mexico/Boise State game, I was disappointed with what I saw in the New Mexico/Boise State game. While it was a tight and competitive game, I was disappointed with the quality of play. I really enjoyed watching the Mountain West a few years ago. Could be a one off, obviously.

Need to slow down. Nobody is anywhere yet.

@Uspshoosierindicated that typically the field is set and it’s just about bid stealers at this point. If so, if they were in they are in but if they were not they would still need to win tomorrow.

American, MWC, big west (maybe). A-10 I guess but I don’t think VCU is in as an at large that is my assumption — but ups delivers the more accurate one.

Do you think that lunardi is nuts for actually have Xavier move up when they lost to Marquette?

So if Michigan were to blow this lead and draw to 31 NET, they should have committee would still be viewing it as a quad 1 loss for IU?

Now we’re doing anti-flight tracking?

How is that a foul on goldin?

Wolf handles the ball so well

If UNC won, they should have left in ski masks.

Cue the talking heads telling us UNC should be because they are a good 1-12 against q1

I heard it was Turgeon with a beard.

They may prefer them but by definition choosing them over their criteria by definition isn’t an ‘autobid’. in either case, I think it’s irrelevant. The suits don’t want to see Langdon hatton and walk ins play. And northwestern has also indicated they won’t play. Worst case IMO is you see a team have to pay some ‘opt out’ fee.

I think you are reading that wrong. If Brownell terminates he owes 20% of remaining compensation — about $3.3 million. It’s 50% only if Clemson terminated.

Yeah, remember how nuts those Ohio state fans were in wanting day fired after he lost to Michigan this year? Really derailed their season, didn’t it? sorry, but the worst thing a fan base can be is apathetic. Winning cures apathy— it’s what happened to IUfb