Stuhoo

WHEREWHEREWHEREWHEREWHEREWHEREWHEREWHEREWHERE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

  Funny thing is, I know you said that tongue-in-cheek, but that is exactly what Matt Painter did recently.    The message board response?  "Even Matt Painter thinks Matt Painter is a failure! Get Cuonzo Martin!"

  The last highlight video that good was for Ivan Renko.

    'Scuse me while I quote myself! ;)       Stuhoo, Posted Today, 09:15 AM This post would be a damning indictment of CTC's teams were it true, but it is not.    We were very high on turnovers last year. With a sophomore pg, a freshman 2 guard, and a freshman at the 3 spot. The two years before last we were not high on turnovers. Experience = fewer turnovers. Period.   Length? This coming year, Yogi is not a "long" player. Hanner is. Troy is. Devin, if he plays the 4, is. Stan is. AntLee, if he comes to IU is. JB2? A little longer and taller than you think. RoJo? Not long. Yante and Josh C? Both very long for their positions. Max? Doesn't seem so.    Overall? Better outside shooting, more experience with our ballhandlers. And...pretty much gotta be better team chemistry. 

  I actually thought that we were significantly improved against the zone the last year. The Penn State debacle and the Purdue abomination were against teams that played little or no zone!   That, and a lot of what folks are griping about is far more than in-game strategies. Sorry if I pinned too much of that griping on you.   As far as in-game strategies; give it time. It's still March and there's lots and lots of time for media and coaching staff public navel-gazing!

 OOOOOOOPs!!   Will edit! (we still need a wing ;)  )

He's 6'5". In college that's a wing folks.   For next year:   Stan, Yogi, Rojo, JB2 = our guards Troy, Max, Collin with a torn ACL = our wings Hanner, Devin, PJ = our bigs   We need bigs AND a wing

  I'm not sure what you're expecting that you haven't seen on this board.   Do you really expect a press release which says: "Jeremy was suspended because he sulked and was regularly using weed"? "Austin has a degree, got minutes and couldn't hit an outside shot, and didn't like some of the other guys on the team"? "Johnny Marlin is Austin's best buddy and doesn't care for many of the returnees"?  "We were so pissed off at lack of focus that we braced the crap out of them in the locker room post-NIT announcement"? "Noah is a great kid and a great teammate but he was in it for one year and grabbed the cash"?   Would that really satiate your curiosity?   SMH

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vxiQ9JCKvE

  His point is that instead of responding to every conspiracy theorist and naysayer in the public and in the media, the IU coaching staff and players are hard at work.   If you think that the coaching staff owes anyone a point by point accountability for every perceived mistake, you are sorely out of touch with reality.   The coaching staff knows that the past year was not a success. What they "owe" Hoosier Nation is their unfailing hard work toward making next season markedly better.   Coach Johnson has reached out to say that is exactly what they are doing.

Big time shooter at the D1 level.   A no-brainer if he is so inclined.

  We play at a fast pace and have had pretty good points per possession numbers in the years preceding last year.   Low turnovers as a highlighted positive number? Wisconsin, we ain't.

  This post would be a damning indictment of CTC's teams were it true, but it is not.    We were very high on turnovers last year. With a sophomore pg, a freshman 2 guard, and a freshman at the 3 spot. The two years before last we were not high on turnovers. Experience = fewer turnovers. Period.   Length? This coming year, Yogi is not a "long" player. Hanner is. Troy is. Devin, if he plays the 4, is. Stan is. AntLee, if he comes to IU is. JB2? A little longer and taller than you think. RoJo? Not long. Yante and Josh C? Both very long for their positions. Max? Doesn't seem so.    Overall? Better outside shooting, more experience with our ballhandlers. And...pretty much gotta be better team chemistry. 

  Your wazoo speaks the truth.

I wanna be Vic when I grow up.

  This, in a nutshell, crystallizes why Will Sheehey may have been CTC's favorite Hoosier player.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRZcYLQsJoY

  Cue Peter Jurkin joke in 3...2...1...

  Just a wild guess:   General George S. Patton and Jaybob?

Dakich reads the message boards.   It will surely be tested as to whether he feels the need to discuss this line of info.

CR3AMnCR1MS0N, on 25 Mar 2014 - 2:00 PM, said:   FWIW, there were 271 players who played at least 200 minutes and were therein eligible to be graded. Trey Lyles, as a top ten five star, graded out at 64th.   How did our IU recruits do?   JB2: 34th RoJo: 80th   And our hopefuls?   Yante Maten: 20th Josh Cunningham: 97th   My general point remains that Yante Maten's credentials against high-level competition have been a bit of a mystery, and that this is empirical evidence that when he's out there with the big boys he's more than capable of holding his own.

For you sabremetrics geeks, I found Yante Maten's PER (Performance Efficiency Rating) from last summer's EBYL AAU league. He was playing against the big boys, and he fared extremely well. (btw, Trey Lyles sucked eggs).   See the linky:   http://www.d1circuit.com/news_article/show/269280?referrer_id=790866

All softball questions. No new ground.

  Good grief.

  Bruce Pearl, the ultimate master motivator, takes on the master of the scowl, Jeremy!   Get yer popcorn for that one!