Hurryin' Hoosiers

Nope. Lots of people wont support him due to the specific transgressions he was accused of


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Poke at you? What are you talking about? You're the one demanding I answer your narrowly focused question.
You choose to ignore everything not coaching that involved in being the leader of a basketball program, where Beard is a unmitigated disaster.
I don't.
Beard has zero, zilch, nada  chance at being IU's HC.
And that is a good thing.
 

If it makes you feel better I don't think you can sound dumber than usual..... 
 
 
 
 
I kid...I kid...Sammy is my guy!  

There is the search option at the top that is helpful if looking for something specific.
This thread is likely to remain the one that gets the most action unless posters having something to say specific to one of the commits.
Maybe we can get a sub-sub forum called Lebowski's Recruit and Transfer Threads :)

Seems we are interested in at least 1 more (could be multiple targets for 1 spot).  Might also mean someone we think is a corner may move over to safety.

Coach Haines has shown an an aptitude for moving players around to best suite their skillset and team need- see JMF to Edge.  I think your hypothesis is spot on @Hurryin' Hoosiers

Seems we are interested in at least 1 more (could be multiple targets for 1 spot).  Might also mean someone we think is a corner may move over to safety.

Given ponds is on the other side, that spot will be hunted regardless lol

Given ponds is on the other side, that spot will be hunted regardless lol

Given ponds is on the other side, that spot will be hunted regardless lol

Given ponds is on the other side, that spot will be hunted regardless lol

Given ponds is on the other side, that spot will be hunted regardless lol

we need starters and depth so I'd take him unless cigs has in-roads on better options that we don't know about.

we need starters and depth so I'd take him unless cigs has in-roads on better options that we don't know about.

we need starters and depth so I'd take him unless cigs has in-roads on better options that we don't know about.

I need somebody to commit so I have something else to read in this thread other than this stupid pissing match. 

Dear lord man. It's a message board. 

Hi, my name is Certified Sunshine Pumper and I'm a illogical conclusion jumper.
Have fun arguing with yourself.  I'll let the thread go back to its intended topic.

I am making an argument about logic and you are making an argument about feelings, footspeed, and avoiding the point, bye

Yes, totally serious, you said IU would never beat an elite team without a mobile QB, but lots of elite teams lose to non-elite teams all the time when the non-elite teams have relatively stationary QBs.
You are arguing for a preference: mobile QB over immobile one. Basically everyone shares that; if Peyton Manning had Mike Vick’s legs he’d be better. I and most others share your preference. But your logic (x can’t happen without y) is not sound.

I didn’t do that, but you said IU won’t beat an elite team without a mobile QB. I assume everyone here can simply read for themselves.
 As I said in my follow-up post, 1. I like mobile QBs, but 2. Lots of ways to win in football, and absolutes like “we’ll never X without Y” just aren’t borne out by the evidence unless Y = “scoring more points than the opponent.”
Perhaps setting aside the evident big feelings would be helpful. Mac Jones is very immobile. Joe Burrow and Stetson Bennett aren’t much different than Rourke in that regard.

Just learned about this game “foot ball” and the QB with the most championships, Thomas Brady. Based on this comment he must’ve been a world championship sprinter, no reason to double-check this assumption