Wisconsin at Indiana Game Thread - ESPN - 9:00pm

[DChoosier 7,054]

2 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

Somebody who knows the rules better than I, please explain this to me. Is the charge/block arc only on drives to the bucket? Because Davis was backing his way in, the defender flopped and got a charge. I think Davis probably did initiate the contact, but the defender's foot was inside the arc -- I thought inside the arc = charge, regardless. Am I wrong? (Probably). 

I do not think that should have been a charge because the defenders foot was clearly in the circle.

[reconmkd 4,168]

Keep the fire rolling!


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[Crimson and Cream 5,699]

A win against Wisconsin would be a nice sedative for this season

[Hovadipo 52,911]

Just now, Crimson and Cream said:

A win against Wisconsin would be a nice sedative for this season

Whiskey also works, for the record. 

[cchuntsman 186]

4 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

Somebody who knows the rules better than I, please explain this to me. Is the charge/block arc only on drives to the bucket? Because Davis was backing his way in, the defender flopped and got a charge. I think Davis probably did initiate the contact, but the defender's foot was inside the arc. I thought defender inside the arc = charge, regardless. Am I wrong? (Probably). 

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the arc only matters if you are a defender off the ball.  

[Deserthoozier 877]

5 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

Somebody who knows the rules better than I, please explain this to me. Is the charge/block arc only on drives to the bucket? Because Davis was backing his way in, the defender flopped and got a charge. I think Davis probably did initiate the contact, but the defender's foot was inside the arc. I thought defender inside the arc = charge, regardless. Am I wrong? (Probably). 

Only wrong against Wisconsin 

[reconmkd 4,168]

Idk but I really want to see the video of Franimal calling a ref a cheating mf’r and a f’n disgrace!


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[IU Hoosier41 14,465]

1 minute ago, Hovadipo said:

Whiskey also works, for the record. 

Been trying this all season. Hasn’t helped much. 

[reconmkd 4,168]

Wow just seen a pic of smiths shoe with the side blown out


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[MoyeNeeded 3,073]

2 minutes ago, Deserthoozier said:

Only wrong against Wisconsin 

Wasn't a flop...smh. DD lowered the boom and pushed off with the left hand.

[LamarCheeks 16,810]

Just now, MoyeNeeded said:

Wasn't a flop...smh. DD lowered the boom and pushed off with the left hand.

"Flop" was a poor choice of words. No need to syh ... Davis definitely initiated contact. But the defender's foot was inside the arc. Why was that not a block. Does the arc not matter in that case. I'm seriously asking -- I'm not sure. 

[hoosierpap 14,300]

Wow


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

[LIHoosier 24,995]

Hey, there's a crowd in the building!

[LamarCheeks 16,810]

Of course Smith hustled downcourt. There was a chance for him to make a bucket. Smith hustling back on defense? That's another story ... 

[Crimson and Cream 5,699]

We've definitely got them out of sync

[schoosier 3,444]

Wisky invented the hack and grab. And on their way to perfecting the push off on rebounds. They on trending up on my most hated list. 

[HoosierAloha 29,887]

The arc is only used for a secondary def Nader. The primary defender can be inside the arc and still draw a charge.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

[Btownclouds 109]

Gasp! Good basketball. Please please keep this play to end the yr

[theriverpilot 5,589]

Of course Smith hustled downcourt. There was a chance for him to make a bucket. Smith hustling back on defense? That's another story ... 

Gotta give him credit for hustling down and pressuring Riever on that inbound play too. Just want to see more of that from him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HoosierAloha 29,887]

Inversion was ready to take that charge... good Smith went around him.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners