Hoosier0908

Can't say I disagree, nor am I stating that he will/won't bank scholly's.  I am just bringing about a larger view of the situation we are in.  The loss of Cunningham will not cause me to "leap off the edge."  Would be nice to get this kid, but I think we are in good standings with kids in 2015 that are "immediate impact."  A one year band-aide like Lee was the answer.  Bringing in a less heralded athlete just to fill the roster may not be.     That being said, I like everything I have seen with Cunningham and will be happy if we are able to land him.  Will need some time in the gym, but has the attitude and basic foundation of skills to be a great college athlete. 

First post, been a viewer for some time.  Happy to be here!  A couple of points:   1)  Cunningham visiting USC is troublesome, but not the end of the world.  Would be a great 4 year player, but I'm not that concerned if we don't land him.    2)  Does nobody realize that we have 3 scholarships for this year/next?!  Whomever else we sign this year, this late in the game, will be taking spots away from (potentially) "higher talent", "immediate impact" players in 2015.  Let's say we sign some kids to fill the scholly's.  What happens next year?  Crean runs kids off?  Unless we find "lightning in the bottle" with a late kid, you could say banking the scholly's is not bad.